citationhunter
Audit research papers and claims for citation quality. Identifies missing citations, weak references, and contradictory evidence. No API key
Open source Open in the app JSON README (API)
About
Audit research papers and claims for citation quality. Identifies missing citations, weak references, and contradictory evidence. No API keys required.
Details
- Kind
- Plugins
- Topic
- No topic detected
- Publisher
- liodon-ai
- Origin
- gemini
- Category
- ferramentas
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Last push
- 2026-06-08T07:20:23Z
- Repository state
- ativo
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
- Added
- 2026-08-30 14:13:39
- Updated
- 2026-08-30 14:13:39
- Origin id
liodon-ai/citationhunter
README
# CitationHunter Audit research papers and claims for citation quality. Identifies missing citations, weak references, contradictory evidence, and produces a structured citation coverage score. Think of it as "Grammarly for citations" - focused on scientific validity and completeness, not grammar. ## Quick Start ``` /citationhunter "Transformer models dominate most NLP tasks." /citationhunter https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 /citationhunter "Attention Is All You Need" ``` ## Install ### Agent Skills (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini CLI, and 50+ hosts) ```bash npx skills add liodon-ai/citationhunter -g ``` ### Claude Code (marketplace) ``` /plugin marketplace add liodon-ai/citationhunter ``` ### Manual ```bash git clone https://github.com/liodon-ai/citationhunter.git ln -s "$(pwd)/citationhunter/skills/citationhunter" ~/.claude/skills/citationhunter ``` ## What It Does | Input | Output | |-------|--------| | A sentence or claim | Missing citations, contradictory evidence, coverage score | | An arXiv link | Full paper audit: missing + weak + contradictory citations | | A paper title | Paper lookup + citation audit | | A PDF/LaTeX file | Full paper audit with method gap analysis | ## Output Sections 1. **Citation Coverage Score** (0-10) - How well the claim/paper is supported 2. **Missing Citations** - Unsupported key statements with suggested papers 3. **Weak Citations** - Outdated/irrelevant references with stronger alternatives 4. **Contradictory Evidence** - Papers that challenge the claim 5. **Methodological Gaps** - Missing baselines, ablations, limitations ## Sources - Semantic Scholar (primary) - arXiv - CrossRef - OpenAlex (fallback) - Web search (supplementary) No API keys required. All sources are public. ## License MIT