Living Memory Wiki — Index
Bundle OKF 0.2 · 0 conceitos · andrewcrenshaw/remember-okf-sample-bundle
Open source Repository Open in the app JSON README (API)
About
# Living Memory Wiki — Index
Total synthesized lessons: 2
Last compiled: 2026-09-05T13:55:31.652Z
## Top Claims
- [[./claims/asserted-fixture-lesson-demonstrating-the-human-actor--d-003.md|Asserted fixture lesson demonstrating the human actor form]] <!-- id: okf-conformance-asserted-003 -->
## Methods
## Facts
- [[./facts/okf-v0-2-conformance-fixture-lesson-e-001.md|OKF v0.2 conformance fixture lesson]] <!-- id: okf-conformance-fixture-001 -->
Details
- Kind
- OKF bundles
- Topic
- AI, RAG & memory
- Publisher
- andrewcrenshaw
- Origin
- okf_github
- Category
- dados
- Version
- 0.2
- Last push
- 2026-09-05T14:34:00Z
- Repository state
- ativo
- License
- NOASSERTION
- Added
- 2026-09-08 09:02:43
- Updated
- 2026-09-08 09:02:43
- Origin id
andrewcrenshaw/remember-okf-sample-bundle:bundle/INDEX.md
README
# remember — OKF v0.2 sample bundle (deletion semantics) A small, fixture-driven OKF v0.2 bundle emitted by the *remember* wiki compiler (Lexenne), published so the deletion-semantics conventions discussed on [knowledge-catalog #207](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/knowledge-catalog/issues/207) can be tested against real producer output rather than prose. ## What this is, and is not - **Is:** the unedited output of our production emitter (private repo `lexenne-remember`, compiler commit `77b283f8b2406f24bf573da21b196ea989a06847`) run over a fixture lesson, two log write-claims, and one tombstone. Every byte under `bundle/` came out of the compiler; nothing was hand-written. - **Is not:** an export of our live corpus. That is a larger artifact and separate work. This bundle proves the emission path end to end, no more. ## What is planted in it (expected findings) | case | where | expected reading | |---|---|---| | write-claim that landed | `bundle/log.md` → `okf-conformance-fixture-001` | resolves to the concept in `bundle/facts/` | | actor-class routing (OKF v0.2 section 7) | `bundle/claims/` asserted lesson vs `bundle/facts/` observed lesson | asserted emits `generated.by: human:<8-hex>` (pseudonymous, derived from the session id when the lesson carries one, otherwise from its stable lesson id); observed emits the process form `remember/0.2` | | basis mapping (#159 enum) | same two lessons | observed emits `basis: live-source`; asserted OMITS `basis` - who stood behind it travels in `generated.by`, and omission carries no negative claim | | write-claim that never landed | `bundle/log.md` → `okf-conformance-never-landed-999` | `never_landed` — recorded, nothing behind it | | deliberate removal | `bundle/tombstones.md` | `presence: removed`, reason `curation`, successor named | | dangling lifecycle edges | concept frontmatter `supersedes` / `contested_by` targets | ordinary §6.1 tolerance — references, not assertions | Presence is sparse per the #207 convention: `removed` and `never_landed` are the only values; the default carries no marker. `bundle/tombstones.md` is the human narration of a removal. **The machine-readable location for absence records is `bundle/.manifest.json`**, under its `absences` key: every removed and never-landed concept is filed there against its stable `remember://lesson/<id>`, so a checker never has to parse prose. A `removed` record carries the tombstone `date`, the `reason`, the attributing `recorded_by`, and a `successor` where one exists; a `never_landed` record carries none of those, because nobody recorded that absence — it is inferred by reconciling `log.md` write-claims against the bundle. The sibling `absenceReconciliation` key states whether that reconciliation pass actually ran (`ok` with a `parsedCount`, `failed`, or `not_run`), so an empty never-landed set is never mistaken for a clean corpus that was never examined. `entries` and `absences` are mutually exclusive: a currently removed concept is excluded from `entries` and has no generated page. **One identifier form for the exclusivity check.** `entries` is keyed by bare lesson id for page addressing, but every `entries` value now carries an `id` field in the same `remember://lesson/<id>` form that keys `absences`. A checker asserts DC-F2 exclusivity by intersecting the `id` VALUES of `entries` with the `id` values (or keys) of `absences` — one identifier form, no normalisation step — so an empty intersection is a real assertion, not an accident of two disjoint key namespaces (knowledge-catalog #207, leesharks run 08; producer fix PCC-6668). Legacy manifests without the field are backfilled on load. `absenceReconciliation` also now carries `falseRemovalClaims` (write-claims that named a removed concept), empty here. ## For checker authors — two things you need about our format 1. **Our log prose.** Write-claims in `log.md` look like `* **Lesson created**: lesson <id> `. The compiler's own reconciliation pass parses them with: ``` /^\*\s\*\*[^*]*created[^*]*\*\*:\s+lesson\s+(\S+)/i ``` Note the claim verb precedes the id. 2. **Our identity scheme.** The stable id lives in each concept's frontmatter `id:` key (`remember://lesson/<id>` in edge references); **filenames are summary slugs and do not contain the id.** A checker that resolves claims against filename stems will not resolve ours — it needs to read `id:` from frontmatter. This is the stable-id-versus-path question from knowledge-catalog #120 showing up as tooling. ## Integrity `SHA256SUMS` covers every file under `bundle/`. Verify in a shell: ``` shasum -a 256 -c SHA256SUMS ``` ## License CC0 1.0 Universal (see `LICENSE`) — same terms as the deletion conformance fixture this is meant to be tested alongside.