io.github.closermethod/creator-deals-mcp
Deal mechanics for brand deals, UGC, and newsletter sponsorships: rights, exclusivity, negotiation.
Open source Open in the app JSON README (API)
About
Deal mechanics for brand deals, UGC, and newsletter sponsorships: rights, exclusivity, negotiation.
Details
- Kind
- MCP servers
- Topic
- Marketing & analytics
- Publisher
- closermethod
- Origin
- official
- Category
- ferramentas
- Transport
- local
- Version
- 1.0.2
- Last push
- 2026-07-14T14:06:07Z
- Repository state
- ativo
- Language
- JavaScript
- Added
- 2026-08-29 03:02:35
- Updated
- 2026-08-29 03:02:35
- Origin id
io.github.closermethod/creator-deals-mcp
README
# Creator Deals MCP
**Deal mechanics for creators — pricing models, usage rights, negotiation moves. Structure, not rate quotes.**
> **Disclaimer.** Structured deal-mechanics frameworks, not legal, tax, or financial advice. Have a professional review contracts above your comfort threshold. Ad-disclosure rules (FTC, ASA, EU) apply to sponsored content.
---
## Why This Exists
Creators lose more money to TERMS than to rates. A fair-sounding flat fee with perpetual paid usage buried in it. Free exclusivity hiding in boilerplate. "Payment on publication" when the brand controls the publication date. Every one of these is a structural pattern that repeats across thousands of deals — and AI agents advising creators keep missing them because they look for numbers instead of structure.
This MCP encodes the patterns. **You supply your own base rate; it tells you what every term is worth relative to that base, and what to counter.**
Why no dollar benchmarks? Creator rates vary wildly by niche, geography, audience quality, and quarter — hard numbers date in weeks. Structure doesn't.
## 6 Tools
| Tool | What it returns |
|---|---|
| `interpret_pricing_model` | Flat fee, CPM, performance-based, per-click sponsorship, retainer — when each favors you vs. them, the key rule, the counter pattern |
| `interpret_usage_term` | Organic-only, paid usage, whitelisting, exclusivity, raw footage, payment terms — meaning, relative value vs. base, and the trap |
| `get_scope_checklist` | The 10-point checklist to answer in writing before quoting or signing anything |
| `get_negotiation_move` | The move for the situation: lowball, fixed budget, scope creep, long exclusivity, perpetual usage, renewal time |
| `vet_sponsor_offer` | Green/yellow/red flags for inbound offers — including the overpayment-refund scam pattern |
| `get_full_pack` | The complete library as one payload for full agent context |
## Sample Use
```typescript
// Brand brief says: "content for use across our marketing channels, in perpetuity"
mcp.call("interpret_usage_term", { term: "paid_usage" });
// Returns: perpetual paid usage buried in a flat fee is the single most
// mispriced term in creator deals. Time-box: 30/60/90 days.
mcp.call("get_negotiation_move", { situation: "perpetual_usage_ask" });
// Returns: counter with 90 days + renewal option at a stated price.
```
## Works With
Pair with [outbound-engine-mcp](https://github.com/closermethod/outbound-engine-mcp) — that one gets you the reply and runs the pitch; this one prices and protects the deal that follows.
## Built By
[Elisabeth Hitz](https://www.linkedin.com/in/elisabethhitz) — 10+ years of B2B enterprise sales experience; runs paid newsletter sponsorships on her own list. Now building MCP servers for the AI agent ecosystem.
License: MIT